
Maurice Blanchot & Emmanuel Levinas
Étienne Balibar – A Thought of/from the Outside: Foucault’s Uses of Blanchot
From Kingston University’s site:
A well-known essay published by Foucault in 1966 on the work of Maurice Blanchot, La pensée du dehors, was translated into English in two different ways: ‘The thought of the outside’, and ‘The thought from outside’. This indicates a deep ambiguity concerning its possible interpretations. Together with the earlier essay on Bataille (‘Preface to Transgression’), the essay forms the metaphysical counterpart to the early ‘archeological’ work, beginning with History of Madness and ending with The Order of Things, centered on the ‘anti-humanist’ doctrine of the elimination of the subject. It is widely supposed that, in his later work, when studying apparatuses of power-knowledge, and when outlining a history of regimes of subjectivation and truth, Foucault had entirely reversed this orientation. The lecture will discuss the enigmatic notion of the ‘outside’ and its relationship to transcendental philosophy, assess the importance of a dialogue with Blanchot in the formation of Foucault’s philosophy, and argue that, contrary to established wisdom, it never ceased to frame the critique of subjectivity in Foucault’s work.
Catherine Malabou, “Can ‘Retreat’ Be a Metaphor?: A Reflection on Meaning after Heidegger’s Withdrawal.”

Declaration of intent of non-publication
I do not intend to publish or republish any work or text of which I am the author, in any form whatsoever, printed or electronic, whether in full or in excerpts, texts of personal nature, of scientific character, or otherwise, or letters addressed to anybody, and any translation of texts of which I am the author. Any edition or dissemination of such texts which have been made in the past without my consent, or which will be made in the future and as long as I live, is against my will expressly specified here and is unlawful in my eyes. As I learn of these, I will ask the person responsible for such pirated editions, or of any other publication containing without permission texts from my hand (beyond possible citations of a few lines each), to remove from commerce these books; and librarians holding such books to remove these booksfrom those libraries.
If my intentions, clearly expressed here, should go unheeded, then the shame of it falls on those responsible for the illegal editions, and those responsible for the libraries concerned (as soon as they have been informed of my intention).
Written at my home, January 3, 2010,
Alexandre Grothendieck.
Otto F K. Deiters, 1865. Drawings of stained neurons in the spinal chord with soma, nucleus, dendrites and axons.
(via 11011001000110101110001)



,%201973.showcase_1.jpg)

The move to diagrams, I think, is definitely a positive move, and a more or less necessary one coming out of the “linguistic turn” with Lacan’s mathemes. -inthesaltmine
One of my favorite diagrammers, Joseph Beuys.